The EU seafarer a dying breed?
| |
 |
| |
During
the last two decades,
both the number of ships registered in EU member states and the
number of EU seafarers have declined.
|
During the last two decades, both the number of
ships registered in EU member states and the number of EU seafarers,
have declined dramatically and this has become a major worry for the
EU Commission and the EU Parliament.
A Commission communication with a number of proposals on training and
recruitment of seafarers has recently been adopted by the Parliament.
The report from the Parliament highlights the importance of seafarers
and seafaring experience to the Union. The aim of the resolution is
to change the declining trend and to make a seafarer career attractive
to the EU Youth. According to the Parliament, the shortfall of well-trained
seafarers is likely to have negative consequences for safe navigation,
number of accidents and marine pollution.
It
is also a concern of the EU shipping industry as a whole, since a number
of land-based jobs where seafaring experience is required.
There
are a number of reasons behind the shortfall, cost competitiveness being
the major one. The member states are therefore encouraged by the Parliament
to reduce fiscal and other costs and burdens that place EU seafarers
at a disadvantage.
There
are other areas where improvement is needed if seafaring once again
will be a natural choice for young Europeans such as work environment
and the national maritime educational programs. To make the latter more
attractive, the Parliament suggests that the shipping industry, the
maritime education and training institutes and the social partners develops
career paths for officers also ashore.
New career ashore
After having spent a part of their working life at sea, its common,
and natural, for officers to start a new career ashore. If the number
of young Europeans gaining an officer license continues to decline,
the consequence will be serious for many shipping and shipping related
activities ashore. Consequently, the European Union runs the risk of
losing shipping knowledge and experience and its shipping tradition.
This is the scenario that the Parliament and the Commission wants to
prevent from happening. One way to create new career paths is to define
shipping in a broader sense.
If
maritime educational programs become more of a natural gateway to the
transport sector as a whole, an officer education would be more attractive
to young people. In a shorter perspective and to meet an almost acute
shortage of officers, the Parliament suggest that seafarers working
as ratings where there today is a surplus, should be retrained as officers.
The
importance of harmonisation of the member states maritime education
and training programs is stressed by the EU institutions. A more uniform
education within the Union has several advantages.
An
acute shortage of officers in one part of EU could more easily be compensated
if there is a surplus in another part. An national education program
and a certificate of competency that is easy for the administration
in another country to identify, will make increase the possibilities
for officers to join other nations merchant fleets. This in addition
to a broader education would mean a significantly larger labour market
for maritime officers.
| |
 |
| |
|
Harmonise contents
METNET is an EU project led by the World Maritime University, WMU,
in Malmö, Sweden. MET is an abbreviation for Maritime Education
and Training and NET is short for network. The overall goal for the
project is to harmonise contents and scope in the officer education.
The
aim is to increase the competitiveness of the individual seafarer, to
increase the number of job opportunities, to increase maritime safety
within EU and to contribute to environmental protection.
At
a conference in Dublin 1996 the question weather the European seafarer
is a dying breed was raised. According to the Transport Commissioner
at that time, Neil Kinnock, the answer had to be yes if the negative
recruitment trend couldnt be changed. This is also the aim for
METNET.
The
project shall support the development of networks between MET institutions
in and outside EU. The thought is that deeper co-operation will make
it possible to plan and to use large investment equipment such as full
mission simulators in a more cost effective way.
In a network were the participating institutions gives courses with
harmonised course curricula, a student and teacher exchange would be
facilitated. However, this would require courses to be given in English.
METNET
is divided into several work packages, WPs, each handling a specific
topic. In WP 2 for instance, national studies are being made to determine
what actions have been taken to improve recruitment and the extent of
drop-outs. Experience from one country is to be shared by
the others.
In
WP 7, teaching aids in English is developed for countries where English
isnt the native language. Initially, aids are produced for courses
in environmental protection, port management and shipping economy. WP
8 is developing support measures for teachers at the MET institutes.
The typical teacher has an officer education and seafaring experience
but lacks pedagogical education. For senior lecturers the time
span since his or hers last voyage at sea is often long. The support
consists of aids covering, for instance, presentation techniques and
planning of simulator exercises.
It
is also the intention of WP 8 to develop means for teachers to keep
up to date with the development in
the industry, ashore and at sea.
WMU is recognised as an organisation with vast experience and knowledge
as a leader of international projects. The problem seen ahead in the
METNET project is, however, how the implementation will be handled in
the participating countries. The view on maritime education and training
and course contents vary between nations, sometimes significantly and
there seems to be a dividing line between North and South in the Union.
Exploit funding possibilities
To finance METNET as well as other projects and suggestions for improvement,
The EU Commission and Parliament wants all member states and social
partners to fully exploit funding possibilities through existing community
instruments, for instance the Socrates and Leonardo da Vinci programmes.
At the same time, they point out that all parties within the industry
have a responsibility for improvement and development of the MET sector.
To
sum up, the main solution for a trend change, is to develop an attractive
education. Apparently, the Commission and the Parliament means that
the days when young Europeans went to sea in their early teens and stayed
there for the rest of their working life is over. In the development
of the MET programs, the officer professions must be seen as transit
professions where the career continues ashore.
The education programs must be harmonised to facilitate a free flow
of manpower, students, teachers and educational resources over the borders
within the EU.
//Rolf Petrén Nilsson
Back to SSG 2, 8 February