|
Safety, Environment & Security |
 |
 |
 |
WEBSITES |
|
|
|  |
Design for bigger and faster ro-ros
Larger, more efficient and faster
these adjectives describe the main design trends within short-sea
ro-ro-shipping in a nutshell. Every detail in the hull lines as well as
the deck and ramp arrangement must be carefully thought of, when
creating the ultimate ro-ros of the 21st century.
The ever increasing pressure upon the ship owners to make
profit in an environment characterised by fierce competition from both
older and newer vessels has lead to a continous need for reducing costs
and improve the efficiency of the operations. In a sea transport system,
the vessels form the most expensive components. The
vessels are also in focus both when it comes to cutting costs and increasing
revenues.
The
recent development of the short-sea ro-ro-vessels has been all about improving
an already well proven concept. The true inventions in this field were
made back in the 1960s. Since then it has all been about refinements.
An
excellent example is the transition from cargo lifts to ramps in cargo
handling on board. In the beginning the lifts had a length just enough
to carry a rolltrailer. A substantial improvement was introducing longer
lifts with greater capacity. Now hardly any ro-ro-operator would even
think about employing a newbuilding not equipped with internal ramps.
By refining and developing the layout of the cargo holds and cargo handling
equipment it has been possible to build ramps in considerably smaller
vessels than before. The loading and discharging is much smoother and
faster, enabling shorter stays in port and a more efficient use of the
vessel. A well known truth is, that it is at sea where a vessel earns
money.
When
looking at the development of the short-sea ro-ro-vessel, there are some
general trends in the design. These several small but important
improvements would hardly have been possible to accomplish without the
intense research and development work made by shipbuilding engineers using
state of the art designing tools. The design process has become more and
more important, and surely this is an essential reason why an average
ro-ro-newbuilding of today is more efficient than ten years ago.
Increase in speed
One of the most striking features about most of the recent newbuildings
in the short sea ro-ro-fleet is the increase of service speed. During
the last decade the average speed of the short-sea ro-ro-fleet has increased
from 17.0 knots to 19.5 knots according to information from ShipPax Information.
This
also tells us a lot about the engine output installed. According to information
from the consulting engineers Deltamarin, an increase in speed from 19
knots to 20 knots for a 12,000 DWT ro-ro-vessel means an increase in power
of 2,300 kW or 23 per cent. To increase the service speed from 19 to 21
knots, an addition of more than half the installed power is needed. At
this stage every gained knot becomes extremely expensive. This is of course
also affecting the fuel consumption in the same way. From this it is possible
to draw the conclusion, that an optimal service speed is considered more
important to the owner or operator than lower building and operational
costs.
The
importance of an optimised hull form is increasing drastically when higher
service speeds are included in the design.
We have several examples where considerable savings have been made on
existing vessels by redesigning the bulb and making small alterations
to the hull lines aft, Mr Markku Kanerva, head of marketing and development
at Deltamarin, explains.
In
an actual case, just the modification of the bulb on a ferry, led to savings
of seven per cent. By adapting a four-metre ducktail and an optimised
trim wedge a further 13 per cent were saved.
Mr
Kanerva says that the hull form aft is of great importance, especially
in vessels with a service speed exceeding 20 knots. Instead of using typical
conventional ro-ro-hull forms with twin
skeg arrangement, Deltamarin has been concentrating on developing an efficient
pram type hull form for open shaft lines, suitable for pod-propulsion
as well.
The
pram type or buttock flow stern first became the typical form for twin
screw vessels, and later also for single screw vessels.
The hydrodynamic qualities are much better with a pram type stern and
therefore we have put emphasis on developing this type, Mr Kanerva says.
A
recent development is the application of trim wedge combined with a ducktail.
Successful design of trim wedge gives better transom wave pattern as well
as reduction of dynamic stern trim and sinkage into even keel, leading
to propulsion power reductions of several per cent depending on the hull
form.
Minimising bow flare
The hull form is not just essential for the vessels performance
regarding speed and the installed power. It also has a great impact on
seakeeping performance, manoeuvrability and stability.
It is possible to squeeze some more lane metres in a vessel by
adapting an extreme deck shape in the fore part, but it also leads to
an extreme type of fore ship hull form and bow flare, Mr Kanerva says.
Excessive
bow flare means high wave inducted impact loads, high accelerations, noise,
whipping vibrations, involuntary speed loss and also voluntary speed loss
for safety reasons.
A good rule of thumb is to avoid bow flare angle against waterline
below
50 degrees in unlimited service, Mr Kanerva explains.
Minimising
the bow flare is a question of both economy and safety. Experience has
shown that the greed for the last deck square metres or some extra centimetres
in the width of the bow ramp during operational conditions may lead to
poor or even unacceptable performance already in moderate head and bow
quartering seas. The master has to make drastic reductions in speed and
perhaps alterations of course not to jeopardise the safety of the vessel
and its crew and inflicting heavy cargo damages. The sea margin is lost
and the schedule cannot be kept. In the long run the last lane metres
may cost more than they earn.
Mr
Kanerva stresses, that a well designed fore ship is also of great importance
for the comfort on board, especially when many of the new designs have
the superstructure and accommodation forward. A main advantage with this
solution is that it offers shelter for the cargo on weather deck.
A vessel with a good bow design makes the ride much smoother in
heavy seas for the crew as well, he says.
Capacity
There has been a clear trend towards larger and larger ro-ro-vessels in
the short-sea segment. The average capacity has doubled from some 1,000
lane metres at the beginning of the 1970s to close to 2,000 lane
metres.
Today we are going towards an average capacity of 3,000 lane metres in
short-sea ro-ro-vessels designed for trailer transports, Mr Kanerva says.
Despite
an increase in size, the efficiency of the vessels has improved too. The
layout of the ro-ro-decks is a key issue. All lane metres should be available
and easily reachable during the short port calls. The era of cargo lifts
was passed years ago, now efficient arrangement and location of fixed
and hoistable ramps and wide stern doors provide simultaneous loading
of all ro-ro-decks.
Also
the access to lower hold is important. In designs with both stern and
bow doors, it is possible to arrange a drive-through principle for lower
hold.
The
ro-ro-vessel of today is more efficient in port and more efficient on
route than its predecessors. So far there is no end in sight for this
development, even if the giant leaps already have
been taken. Still there is much to be done in the details, together forming
the whole.
The
ship designers still focus on improving both the layout of cargo holds
and equipment and the vessels hull forms. New propulsion systems, such
as pods, enable new possibilities to a more efficient usage of the space
on board. They also improve the manoeuvring capabilities dramatically.
But the time has not quite come for introducing the somewhat more expensive
pod-propulsion on standard ro-ro-vessels, Mr Kanerva thinks.
However,
investments are also needed in ports, because insufficient infrastructure
may ruin the earning potential of the most efficient ro-ro-vessel.
Tailor-made
transport systems with a limited number of fixed ports also put pressure
on the port operators to reach optimum total efficiency.
Two paths to go
The short-sea ro-ro-vessels being built can roughly be divided into two
main groups. There are allround vessels, mainly designed for shipments
of vehicles, rolltrailers and other cargoes that may be moved by wheels.
The owners of these vessels seldom have a charter already at the building
stage. The vessels are also planned for being as attractive as possible
on the second hand market.
And
then there are different kinds of vessels built for a specific trade or
cargo, such as forest products. Usually the owner orders the vessel after
having received a long-term charter.
An
interesting project in the latter field is a special ro-ro-carrier for
the aircraft manufacturer Airbus. Deltamarin is carrying out the project
design for the vessel, which is intended for carrying parts of the so
far largest Airbus airliner between the factories in Germany and France.
Despite being designed for one specific task and one specific type of
cargo, the vessel will also have a potential on other ro-ro-trades, which
is typical for most of the purpose-built special vessels of today, Mr
Kanerva says.
// Pär-Henrik Sjöström
Back to SSG 3, March 8
Latest update 18-10-2006 8:49
|
 |
CURRENT SSG |
|
No 24/2008

Order a copy
|
 |
CURRENT SST |
|
No 1/2012

Köp numret
|
 |
|