Gas tankers in for a rough ride
Most gas tanker owners have surely
resigned to the fact that there is no immediate prospect of increased
demand for the time being.
Some owners like Bergesen d.y. believe the gas market
will improve in the autumn and cite increased scrapping as an important
factor. However, the current problem is not necessarily one of supply,
but rather of demand for freight.
Undoubtedly
the demand for LPG and derivates is far too low to sustain freight at
the current level. After a spurt of unexpected demand in January the
demand for tonnage in North West Europe (NEW) is now lacklustre, apart
from some coastal butane cargoes.
Market fundamentals
Market fundamentals are certainly not kind to owners, but developments
in the past two months are a result of a general slowdown in many industrial
sectors, both upstream (raw materials etc.) and downstream demand for
product.
All
of this has a negative impact on freight. It was principally a slowdown
in US demand which set off a chain reaction.
Lower
demand was made worse by higher oil prices and renewed uncertainty after
the terrorist attack in the US in September. Since then the US has waged
war on terrorism and the hunt for terrorist has made the oil market
quite uneasy at times.
SR carriers hard hit
In this report we only deal with semi-refrigerated (SR) vessels up to
22,000 cbm and our diagram plots a 6,500 cbm and a 15,000 cbm vessel.
Since
January freight levels have fallen, more dramatically for the biggest
SR vessels than for the smaller sizes. We are now likely to see freight
rates for both vessel sizes drop further in the next couple of months.
In
our last issue we wrote, Uncertainty permeated the gas market.
As it happened this turned out to be an understatement.It is now more
like despondency. Even the big three operators, Bergesen, A.P. Møller
and Exmar are not fully able to maximise on their pool operations because
too much idle time for vessels.
As
is apparent from the attached graph the bigger SR carriers are having
a bad time of it. Most of the vessels in this class are engaged in the
chemical gas market, and there are relatively few owners.
Many
of these vessels have difficulties finding permanent employment and
suffer because there has been a product shift in upstream activities.
As a consequence these vessels have ventures into the pure LPG markets
for propane and butane and have had to compete with bigger units.
The
result is a squeeze on freight rates and this will continue. To add
to the pressure another 10 vessels in this class are due for delivery
in 2002 and 2003.
Without
new demand from somewhere the surplus could force owners to scrap older
tonnage.
The smaller carriers
The market for the smaller sizes is prevalent in the NEW area, and particularly
in the North Sea basin. Statoil sold over two million tonnes of LPG
to NEW based customers last year and is likely to increase this year
given sufficient demand. In fact Statoil handles around 40 vessels per
month at the Mongstad and Kårstø terminals. Landed cost
of these shipments will decide whether or not Statoil can get rid of
all its LPG in the future.
So
far LPG has been a good business for Statoil, according to Mr Thor Abrahamsen,
who is responsible for LPG trading. Traditionally one third of the landed
cost is freight. To balance this out the freight has to come down with
gas prices. Propane and butane prices are very volatile and notoriously
difficult to predict. They could fall further.
//Petter Arentz
Back to SSG 4, April 5