![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
European ship repair a cut-throat business
Emphasis on quality, expertise and tight scheduling has helped bolster ship repairers in North West Europe, while yards in the Baltic with a few exceptions still rely on a competitive advantage in the region in pure steel work. However, the market remains fiercely competitive and further consolidation
is necessary in order to reduce overcapacity. After Erika
and Prestige the regulatory regime is tightened considerably
as the approach to ship standards through new conventions
or to amendments to existing ones has hardened and owner
will have to spend more money in the repair yards. The forced phase-out of single-hull tankers will also have an effect,
although it is hard to gauge at the moment. The ban on TBT antifouling
paint on EU vessels was formally in force by 1 July last year, and
will be enforced also for third flagged vessels entering EU ports
from 1 January 2008. Less efficient anti-foulants will be used,
which will spell more visits to the dry dock. The North European ship repair market has always been competitive, but since the early 1990s more and more yards were starved of newbuilding orders and they were forced into the ship repair market to keep going. The intense, international competition for some of the big steel jobs only affects very few yards in North Europe. What matters to the repairers is the regional competition.
Increased near term demand By this time the average age of the tanker fleet will also be lower.
However, the volume of repair needed on 1990s-built double-hull
vessels is not fully realised as yet. Extensive internal spaces are susceptible to corrosion and will
need increased inspection. Whether or not this will translate into
more docking time is a matter for some debate. Experts can only agree that the most significant increase in demand
from 2005 and onwards will come from the rapidly growing container
fleet, as age increases. In this scenario it is expected that low
cost facilities in the Baltic, East Mediterranean and the Black
Sea will maintain their competitive pressure on the higher cost
yards in North West Europe. Because of the excess regional ship repair capacity any yard have
gone further down the line to specialise and to develop niche markets.
Owners looking for the bargain
Labour and steel is the most important repair cost elements, except
in specialised niche markets where delivery time plays an important
role. The over-capacity allows the owner/operator to shop
around. But, as always, there are exceptions. The Polish yard Remontowa
in Gdansk has proved capable of fairly complex conversion work,
and is now one of the major players in the European conversion market.
Our illustrations show the Knutsen OAS tanker Tove Knutsen which
is undergoing an extensive conversion at Remontowa. It involves
2,000 tonnes of steel work to install longitudinal bulkheads in
the side cargo tanks as well as a new interior bottom above the
existing bottom. This conversion implies that cargo lines, valves and heating coils
must be rearranged. To top it all up the vessels dynamic positioning
system is upgraded to DP2 class. This involves building a new auxiliary engine room with a new generator
set producing 2.3 MW and to replace the forward tunnel thrusters
with a new azimuth thruster. The ships electric and automation
system is also being modified. All class papers are prepared by
the yards own design office. General repair/conversions Examples of yards to have found special niches are Orskov Yard,
which converted the Fjord Norway and Fredericia, which did extensive,
and technically complicated work on Color Traveller. //Petter Arentz Latest update 18-10-2006 8:49 |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
All material © Scandinavian Shipping Gazette. Scandinavian Shipping Gazette | www.shipgaz.com | info@shipgaz.com | webmaster | Contact us | Cookie information |